IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v466y1983i1p103-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program Evaluation and Appropriate Governmental Change

Author

Listed:
  • ELEANOR CHELIMSKY

Abstract

Examining the potential and the limitations of evaluation, this article envisions an essential role for evaluation in achieving appropriate governmental change. That role is a deliberate one that seeks to improve the basis for policymaking, rather than to influence the direction of policy. Evaluation can do this by bringing objective information to bear on whether a proposed change—in any policy direction—is likely to reach its goals. Current limitations of evaluation are identified as resulting from the newness of the evaluation field, from differing perspectives among evaluation producers and users, and from various systemic situations which block or vitiate the evaluative effort. New uses of evaluation methodologies are proposed, along with creative management of evaluation performance. Finally, a clearinghouse to ensure the cumulative use of evaluation findings is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Chelimsky, 1983. "Program Evaluation and Appropriate Governmental Change," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 466(1), pages 103-118, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:466:y:1983:i:1:p:103-118
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716283466001007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716283466001007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716283466001007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:466:y:1983:i:1:p:103-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.