IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v450y1980i1p165-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Holocaust and the Enigma of Uniqueness: A Philosophical Effort at Practical Clarification

Author

Listed:
  • Alice L. Eckardt

    (Department of Religion Studies faculty, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania)

  • A. Roy Ecoardt

    (Department of Religion Studies faculty, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania)

Abstract

This philosophical analysis seeks to foster understanding between representatives of diverse disciplines in the study of the Holocaust. The article inquires whether there are ways to avoid the mystification of the Holocaust without losing its singularity. Three concepts of uniqueness are utilized: ordinary uniqueness, unique uniqueness, and transcending uniqueness. Eight propositions are submitted that concern: the salience of facticity, the challenge of the Holocaust to conventional tools of study, the relation of historic antisemitism and the Holocaust, the relevance of eschatological images, the bearing of the Holocaust upon soteriological expression, ideology as a weapon against the Holocaust's concreteness, the theft of the Holocaust for antisemitic and anti-Israeli purposes, and the jointure of nomothetic and idiographic interpretation as a possible aid to understanding. In conclusion, the category of transcending uniqueness is applied to the moral dimension of the encounter with the Holocaust in a way that links a social ethic and the sociology of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice L. Eckardt & A. Roy Ecoardt, 1980. "The Holocaust and the Enigma of Uniqueness: A Philosophical Effort at Practical Clarification," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 450(1), pages 165-178, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:450:y:1980:i:1:p:165-178
    DOI: 10.1177/000271628045000114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271628045000114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271628045000114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:450:y:1980:i:1:p:165-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.