IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v448y1980i1p86-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic Tenure: Its Recipients and Its Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Lionel S. Lewis

Abstract

A great deal has been written about the pros and cons of academic tenure but little systematic research has been done on the subject. Through an examination of the dossiers— vitae , letters of recommendation, and written assessments—of 115 individuals awarded tenure in 1967 and 1968, this paper attempts to shed some light on the characteristics of those awarded tenure and on its effects. There are large gaps in what writers know about candidates. Still, candidates are portrayed in the most favorable light. Because hard and fast criteria are not applied, the process for awarding tenure seems to be less stringent than evaluation for promotion to Full Professor. It would appear that since tenure does not primarily work either to reduce the intellectual activity of faculty or to protect the idiosyncratic or dissenting scholar, its central function is to insure minimal performance standards and compatibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Lionel S. Lewis, 1980. "Academic Tenure: Its Recipients and Its Effects," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 448(1), pages 86-101, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:448:y:1980:i:1:p:86-101
    DOI: 10.1177/000271628044800109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271628044800109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271628044800109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:448:y:1980:i:1:p:86-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.