IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v426y1976i1p98-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Report on Committee II

Author

Listed:
  • James O. Freedman

Abstract

Professor Abraham's paper presents con siderable evidence that the American people consider the Judiciary the most effective of the major government insti tutions. One of the committee's questions was why this was so. Two possible reasons are: the Supreme Court has shown a capacity to resolve issues the nation felt should be re solved ; the Court has often met people's expectations better than other government institutions. The committee gave considerable attention to the selection of judges, particularly the criteria for their selection. It devoted some time, also, to issues relating to the organization of judicial resources: whether diversity jurisdiction and 3-judge courts should be abolished, and whether federal judicial salaries should be raised. Surprisingly little time was spent on questions of the proper role of the Supreme Court in American society. Four major themes were the focus of the discussion of federalism: what are the implications of federalism for governmental effi ciency ; would a system placing more authority at the local level result in greater citizen participation; how much is known about how federalism operates; and should govern mental units be designed which are appropriate in scale to the tasks expected of them?

Suggested Citation

  • James O. Freedman, 1976. "Report on Committee II," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 426(1), pages 98-105, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:426:y:1976:i:1:p:98-105
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627642600110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627642600110
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627642600110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:426:y:1976:i:1:p:98-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.