IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v426y1976i1p70-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Report on Committee I

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Bender
  • Martha A. Field

Abstract

It was suggested that a way of clarifying con stitutional values might be to look closer at the framers of the Constitution—what were their views and background. They were elitists, from diverse backgrounds, representing a rela tively broad spectrum for the time. Particular revolutionary values were discussed, beginning with equality. Discussion particularly centered on whether equality referred to "equal ity of opportunity" or "equality of result." It was expressed that equality of result was not in conflict with equality of opportunity but a necessary tool to achieve it. Generally, equality of opportunity was preferred to equality of result, except that there should be a certain amount of result equality in order to ensure real equality of opportunity, and it was agreed that quotas were sometimes necessary to correct past discrimination. Other values were discussed briefly, including domestic tranquility, exporting democracy, free speech, constitutional respect for individual autonomy and privacy, and fairness of treatment by government. Revolu tionary values were summarized as falling into 3 categories: freedom of expression, equality, and protection from govern ment arbitrariness.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Bender & Martha A. Field, 1976. "Report on Committee I," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 426(1), pages 70-80, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:426:y:1976:i:1:p:70-80
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627642600108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627642600108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627642600108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:426:y:1976:i:1:p:70-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.