IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v425y1976i1p74-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incumbent Television: A Case of Indecent Exposure

Author

Listed:
  • Newton N. Minow
  • Lee M. Mitchell

Abstract

Throughout his term of office, an incumbent president of the United States has ready access to tele vision time which allows him to reach millions of potential voters regularly, conveying both his views and "image" at little or no cost to himself or his political supporters. In con trast, the opposition party and those potential candidates who would challenge the incumbent's reelection have little similar access. An incumbent member of Congress, although not enjoying television access to the same extent as the presi dent, also has a unique television advantage over potential challengers. While Congress prevents broadcast coverage of many of its activities, individual members are able to produce their own television programming to reach voters. This "incumbent television" can be a significant electoral ad vantage to the officeholder seeking reelection. Moreover, with incumbents dominating television, contrasting political viewpoints and personalities, instead of being presented in rational debate throughout an office term, appear too often only in political "spots" immediately preceding elections. Innovations such as televised National Debates, limited right of reply for the opposition party, government-sponsored broadcast time for presidential candidates, and television coverage of congressional proceedings, would counter this trend and help to fulfill television's potential as a medium for political debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Newton N. Minow & Lee M. Mitchell, 1976. "Incumbent Television: A Case of Indecent Exposure," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 425(1), pages 74-87, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:425:y:1976:i:1:p:74-87
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627642500106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627642500106
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627642500106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:425:y:1976:i:1:p:74-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.