IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v424y1976i1p29-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exchanges with the People's Republic of China: Symbols and Substance

Author

Listed:
  • Douglas P. Murray

Abstract

Since the advent of Ping-Pong diplomacy in April 1971 and the joint U.S.-PRC Shanghai Communique almost a year later, the United States has become one of China's princi pal exchange partners—despite the absence of formal diplo matic relations. The countries' differing social systems and goals are well reflected in the exchange process and the im balance in flow of visitors: approximately 10,000 to 12,000 Americans to the PRC and barely 700 Chinese to the U.S. On the U.S. side, two general categories and four specific ex change "channels" are involved: "government-facilitated" exchanges, through direct negotiations and in cooperation with designated private organizations, and private arrange ments, ad hoc and through organizations apparently having a "special relationship" with the PRC. Although Americans of all backgrounds and viewpoints have visited China, formal exchanges of scholars have been heavily weighted in scien tific and technical fields, and cultural projects in performing arts and sports—reflecting Chinese but not always U.S. pref erences. Exchanges cannot be entirely removed from politics despite their avowed "people-to-people" nature, and critical problems remain concerning reciprocity, substantive content, and integrity. Although diplomatic relations might lead to extended student exchanges and cooperative research, the effect probably will be most evident in the form and content rather than volume of activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Douglas P. Murray, 1976. "Exchanges with the People's Republic of China: Symbols and Substance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 424(1), pages 29-42, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:424:y:1976:i:1:p:29-42
    DOI: 10.1177/000271627642400105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271627642400105
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271627642400105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:424:y:1976:i:1:p:29-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.