IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v380y1968i1p125-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons of Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Critchfield

Abstract

One of the most urgent problems facing the next Secretary of State is how to develop a politically oriented counterinsurgency doctrine and a Foreign Service capable of implementing it, in which top priority is put on defeating political subversion, rather than the enemy's military forces. The United States military establishment has been somewhat discredited in Vietnam, not for failing to do its job, but because the State Department has failed to face and solve the problem of political subversion. This allowed Hanoi to apply successfully Lenin's principle of "exploiting internal contradictions in the enemy camp" to divide and weaken the American and South Vietnamese societies. From mid-1963 until its subversion was arrested and partly countered in mid-1968, Hanoi exploited a serious internal contradiction created by the seizure of state power in Saigon by a self-serving cabal of North Vietnamese refugees, thus effectively denying the South Vietnamese people the right to self-determination, although this was the political basis of the American war effort. The development of a successful counterstrategy, and the personnel to carry it out, will depend on the new administration's ability to understand the enemy—thinking, strategy, and tactics—and to assert supreme political authority in future counterinsurgency efforts, whether they occur in Vietnam, elsewhere or—and the same doctrine will have application—in the United States itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Critchfield, 1968. "Lessons of Vietnam," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 380(1), pages 125-134, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:380:y:1968:i:1:p:125-134
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626838000116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626838000116
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626838000116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:380:y:1968:i:1:p:125-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.