IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v333y1961i1p85-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Political Science View of National Emergency Disputes

Author

Listed:
  • John Perry Horlacher

    (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

Abstract

Adequate regard for basic liberties and the values of self-determination in labor-management relations requires a major modification in the usual approach to the problem of the national emergency dispute. Excessive con cern with the emergency threat has dominated thinking about this problem, has produced "emergencies," and has impaired values essential to a free society. The national emergency strike inevitably assumes a political character, generating strong political pressures which result in an undesirable politi cal settlement. This tendency is seriously aggravated by the unsophisticated notion that the strike is exclusively a un ion weapon. Progress toward solution of the problem must proceed from a recognition that the emergencies are essentially political and that preservation of free collective bargaining should be the primary objective in any policy that is formu lated. A fundamental approach requires depoliticalizing the emergency dispute, reducing the pressures on the government, and increasing the pressures on the disputants. Toward this end it is suggested that use of the partial injunction should be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • John Perry Horlacher, 1961. "A Political Science View of National Emergency Disputes," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 333(1), pages 85-95, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:333:y:1961:i:1:p:85-95
    DOI: 10.1177/000271626133300108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271626133300108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/000271626133300108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:333:y:1961:i:1:p:85-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.