IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anjomc/v17y2020i1_supplps9-s31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contract Comprehension: Prudent Takaful Claim Decision

Author

Listed:
  • Rubayah Yakob
  • Hendon Redzuan
  • Hawati Janor
  • Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M.

Abstract

Takaful Dinamik Berhad (TDB) is one of the leading takaful companies in Malaysia. Yusof bin Ahmad purchased one of its products, the investment-linked takaful plan, five years ago. He had dutifully paid all his contributions (i.e., premium) since the policy was enforced. Sadly, Yusof was diagnosed with a Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis disease. After the diagnosis, he submitted a claim to TDB under the critical illness benefit. His claim was nonetheless rejected on the basis of not meeting the duration of the illness, nor demonstrating the symptoms of the illness as specified in the policy. The decision to reject the claim was made by Borhan, the claim manager of TDB, after a thorough consideration of the case. After the rejection, Yusof then submitted an appeal through the Central Bank of Malaysia (or Bank Negara Malaysia, BNM). In ensuring fair treatment to all policyholders, BNM requested TDB to promptly re-examine Yusof’s claim. This case presents the challenges of understanding the coverage, the concepts, and the provisions of takaful contract in making a claim decision. The case ends with Borhan pondering on how best to resolve the dispute.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubayah Yakob & Hendon Redzuan & Hawati Janor & Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M., 2020. "Contract Comprehension: Prudent Takaful Claim Decision," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 17(1_suppl), pages 9-31, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:17:y:2020:i:1_suppl:p:s9-s31
    DOI: 10.1177/0972820119884389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972820119884389
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972820119884389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:17:y:2020:i:1_suppl:p:s9-s31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.