IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anjomc/v14y2017i2p198-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Appraisal Challenge at Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)

Author

Listed:
  • Anwar Khurshid
  • Abdul Karim Khan
  • Sara Alvi

Abstract

The case discusses the multitude of challenges that CAA faces with respect to its performance appraisal system. Sumair Saeed, Chief Human Resource CAA, feels that problems lie in the implementation of the current appraisal system. Firstly, the system of targets and objectives between and the appraiser and the appraisee at the start of the year is not being followed. This leads employees to feel unfairly treated because no criteria for performance appraisal for their evaluation have been agreed upon. Secondly, Sumair feels there is no buy-in for the performance appraisal system since supervisors regard appraisal as extra workload and an uneasy time of the year. Supervisors consider it to be a confrontational rather than developmental/feedback exercise with the subordinate. Moreover, supervisors lack training in providing feedback on appraisals. It is felt that the culture of the organisation develops hostility and distrust when the appraisals are being conducted. The appraisal system doesn’t differentiate between performers or non-performers; thus decisions on promotions or career progressions can’t be based on appraisals. The problem of demotivation among employees is also a result of an ineffective performance appraisal system, as no differentiation exists between star performers and non-performers. Sumair is now contemplating the changes in the design or the implementation of the performance appraisal system which are required to rectify the process of performance appraisal at CAA.

Suggested Citation

  • Anwar Khurshid & Abdul Karim Khan & Sara Alvi, 2017. "Performance Appraisal Challenge at Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority (CAA)," Asian Journal of Management Cases, , vol. 14(2), pages 198-225, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:198-225
    DOI: 10.1177/0972820117712304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972820117712304
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972820117712304?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anjomc:v:14:y:2017:i:2:p:198-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.