IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v91y2026i4p595-622.html

Neighborhood Desirability and Decision-Making in Online, Multiracial, Metropolitan America

Author

Listed:
  • Max Besbris
  • Ariela Schachter
  • John Kuk

Abstract

In the United States, the housing search process has largely moved online for urban residents, yet little work has examined if and how the information homeseekers are exposed to on housing websites matters for their assessments of potential destinations. We designed a unique, geographically contextual survey experiment that uses real neighborhood names and actual online housing advertisement text to test if residents’ ratings of neighborhoods as desirable are affected by novel information. We find that online housing information—descriptions of housing units, neighborhoods, and how to apply for leases—largely reproduces the existing racial-spatial hierarchy, where non-poor White neighborhoods are rated as the most desirable, and poor Black and Latinx neighborhoods are rated as the least, with Asian neighborhoods in between. Residents’ prior familiarity with neighborhoods in their metro attenuates but does not fully explain away these effects, and the effect varies by race/ethnicity, with White residents the most sensitive to novel information. We offer a sophisticated model of the digital information environment in which an ethnoracially diverse population is exposed to neighborhood options, and we detail how our methods improve survey experiment design more broadly. Our results show that relatively small amounts of seemingly race-neutral information can affect residential preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Besbris & Ariela Schachter & John Kuk, 2026. "Neighborhood Desirability and Decision-Making in Online, Multiracial, Metropolitan America," American Sociological Review, , vol. 91(4), pages 595-622, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:91:y:2026:i:4:p:595-622
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224261446899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224261446899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224261446899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:91:y:2026:i:4:p:595-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.