IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v90y2025i3p455-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Essentializing Merit: Disability and Exclusion in Elite Private School Admissions

Author

Listed:
  • Estela B. Diaz
  • Lauren A. Rivera

Abstract

Historically, elite schools have selected students in ways that reproduce advantages for dominant groups and exclude groups deemed undesirable. The specific outgroup in question has changed over time, but the underlying logic used to exclude these groups is often related to disability. Yet, disability as a social category has received minimal attention in discussions of elite reproduction. In this article, we draw on qualitative data collected from elite independent pre-K–12 schools to show that disability is indeed a salient basis of selection into elite educational environments, one that begins at the earliest moments of educational sorting: admission to elite early childhood programs. Through interviews with admissions personnel, we show that elite independent schools explicitly structure their admissions processes to identify—and exclude—children who are perceived as having or being at risk of developing any type of disability, regardless of impairment type or support needs. We argue that admissions practices at elite independent schools (1) serve as a form of social closure intended to restrict enrollment to young children perceived as able-bodied and neurotypical, and (2) represent a case of essentializing merit , in which elite gatekeepers construct merit as an intrinsic, rather than achieved, property of individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Estela B. Diaz & Lauren A. Rivera, 2025. "Essentializing Merit: Disability and Exclusion in Elite Private School Admissions," American Sociological Review, , vol. 90(3), pages 455-492, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:90:y:2025:i:3:p:455-492
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224251326096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224251326096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224251326096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:90:y:2025:i:3:p:455-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.