IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v90y2025i2p257-290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religion, Perceptions of Scientists’ Moral Culture, and Support for Science in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy L. O’Brien
  • Shiri Noy

Abstract

How do perceptions of scientists’ moral values relate to support for science in society? Recent advances in the sociology of science and religion suggest that people associate scientists with moral values in addition to factual knowledge, and that concerns about scientists’ morality are why members of some religious groups are more critical of science than non-religious people. We test this theory using data from a probability sample of U.S. adults that includes new measures of beliefs about scientists’ moral values, such as their compassion, fairness, and generosity ( n = 1,513). Results from structural equation models indicate that active members of all religious groups are, to varying degrees, more skeptical than atheists and agnostics of scientists’ moral character. A decomposition of direct and indirect effects indicates that beliefs about scientists’ moral values play an intermediary role in the relationship between religion and support for science, and that support for science among the religious is partially suppressed by their concerns about scientists’ morality. This article offers the first direct evidence of the moral culture the U.S. public associates with scientists. We suggest that religious differences in support for organized science reflect religious differences in beliefs about scientists’ moral values.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy L. O’Brien & Shiri Noy, 2025. "Religion, Perceptions of Scientists’ Moral Culture, and Support for Science in the United States," American Sociological Review, , vol. 90(2), pages 257-290, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:90:y:2025:i:2:p:257-290
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224251316904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224251316904
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224251316904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:90:y:2025:i:2:p:257-290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.