IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amsocr/v88y2023i5p872-900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polyoccupationalism: Expertise Stretch and Status Stretch in the Postindustrial Era

Author

Listed:
  • Léonie Hénaut
  • Jennifer C. Lena
  • Fabien Accominotti

Abstract

Past research has posited that occupations are distinct and exclusive communities of workers and used single-entry questions in surveys to measure occupational self-identification. Our study challenges that view by reporting the existence of polyoccupationalism, or workers’ simultaneous identification with multiple occupations. We predict this phenomenon co-occurs with postindustrial forms of work organization and that its expression varies with workers’ position in the occupational structure. Using a survey on creative workers that uniquely allowed respondents to identify with multiple occupations, we find individuals report higher levels of polyoccupationalism when their work is more contract- and project-based, net of other individual and occupational attributes. We further show that polyoccupationalism takes different forms at the top and the bottom of the occupational hierarchy: whereas the polyoccupationalism of high-status “entrepreneurs†stretches expertise—they identify with occupations that are similar in status but functionally distinct—that of lower-status “hustlers†stretches status—the occupations they report involve similar tasks but stand farther apart on the occupational status scale. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding workers’ occupational identities and the dynamics of occupational hierarchies.

Suggested Citation

  • Léonie Hénaut & Jennifer C. Lena & Fabien Accominotti, 2023. "Polyoccupationalism: Expertise Stretch and Status Stretch in the Postindustrial Era," American Sociological Review, , vol. 88(5), pages 872-900, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:88:y:2023:i:5:p:872-900
    DOI: 10.1177/00031224231190942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00031224231190942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00031224231190942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amsocr:v:88:y:2023:i:5:p:872-900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.