IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/agspub/v3y2014i2p295-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Defense of Intellectual Autonomy: A Response to Hendricks

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Moyo

    (Sam Moyo is Executive Director of the African Institute for Agrarian Studies (AIAS), Harare, Zimbabwe. Email: sam_moyo@yahoo.com)

  • Praveen Jha

    (Praveen Jha is Chairperson of the Centre for Informal Sector and Labour Studies (CISLS) and faculty at the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning (CESP), School of Social Sciences (SSS), Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, India. Email: praveenjha2005@gmail.com)

  • Paris Yeros

    (Paris Yeros is Adjunct Professor of International Economics at the Federal University of ABC (UFABC), São Paulo, Brazil. Email: parisyeros@gmail.com)

Abstract

This article is a response to Fred Hendricks’ critique of our most recent statement on the classical and contemporary agrarian questions. The critique, we believe, is a gross misunderstanding of our position on a variety of issues, including populism, nationalism, the character of the peasantry and industrialization. In defence of our intellectual integrity and autonomy, we restate here our basic positions and outline the trajectory of our collective research projects, in the hope that our positions are put into better perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Moyo & Praveen Jha & Paris Yeros, 2014. "In Defense of Intellectual Autonomy: A Response to Hendricks," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 3(2), pages 295-302, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:295-302
    DOI: 10.1177/2277976014551489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2277976014551489
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2277976014551489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:295-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.