IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/agspub/v12y2023i3p295-318.html

Is It Worth Enduring? Labor in Philippine Mango Fruit Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Noe John Joseph E. Sacramento
  • Gayle Candice D. Cañete

Abstract

This article examines the process of labor exploitation in mango fruit farming in the Philippines. It provides a case study based on primary data collected through key informant interviews as well as secondary data. The article argues that contemporary mango fruit farming remains within the conventional labor dynamics inherited from historical capitalist domination and exploitation. The drive for transformative development has favored orchard owners and financiers leaving aside laborers’ well-being, welfare, and safety nets. Moreover, the ideological normalization of laborers’ dire conditions has led to acceptance of whatever conditions are allowed by powerful actors. The plight of laborers in the mango fruit industry remains a relevant and continuing struggle that requires relentless advocacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Noe John Joseph E. Sacramento & Gayle Candice D. Cañete, 2023. "Is It Worth Enduring? Labor in Philippine Mango Fruit Farming," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 12(3), pages 295-318, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:295-318
    DOI: 10.1177/22779760231188196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779760231188196
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779760231188196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2010. "The Political Economy of Agricultural and Food Policies: Recent Contributions, New Insights, and Areas for Further Research," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 33-58.
    2. Beg, Sabrin, 2021. "Tenancy and clientelism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 201-226.
    3. Josep M. Fradera, 2004. "The historical origins of the Philippine economy: a survey of recent research of the Spanish colonial era," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 44(3), pages 307-320, November.
    4. Keijiro Otsuka & Yuko Nakano & Kazushi Takahashi, 2016. "Contract Farming in Developed and Developing Countries," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 353-376, October.
    5. Hal Hill, 2013. "The Political Economy of Policy Reform: Insights from Southeast Asia," Asian Development Review, MIT Press, vol. 30(1), pages 108-130, March.
    6. Manuel Montes, 1995. "Book Review: The Philippines: The Political Economy of Growth and Impoverishment in the Marcos Era," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 147-149, March.
    7. James K. Boyce, 1992. "Of Coconuts and Kings: The Political Economy of an Export Crop," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 23(4), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Genevieve LeBaron & Nicola Phillips, 2019. "States and the Political Economy of Unfree Labour," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Bardhan, Pranab, 2022. "Clientelism and governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Sen & Jiang, Rongrong & Liu, Ling & Chan, Felix T.S., 2025. "A hybrid method combining three-way decision and DEA game cross-efficiency for procurement mode selection in contract farming," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Christophe Gouel, 2016. "Trade Policy Coordination and Food Price Volatility," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1018-1037.
    3. Benali, Marwan & Brümmer, Bernhard & Afari-Sefa, Victor, "undated". "Small producer participation in export vegetable supply chains and poverty: evidence from different export schemes in Tanzania," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 262583, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    4. Sumarno, Theresia B. & Sihotang, Parulian & Prawiraatmadja, Widhyawan, 2022. "Exploring Indonesia's energy policy failures through the JUST framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Stephen Morgan & Martin Shanahan, 2010. "The Supply Of Economic History In Australasia: The Australian Economic History Review At 50," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(3), pages 217-239, November.
    6. Jose‐Maria Garcia‐Alvarez‐Coque & Ibtissem Taghouti & Victor Martinez‐Gomez, 2020. "Changes in Aflatoxin Standards: Implications for EU Border Controls of Nut Imports," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 524-541, September.
    7. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2020. "Who has the better story? On the narrative foundations of agricultural development dichotomies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Ananya Khajuria & Shaveta Kohli, 2026. "Prioritizing sustainability in agricultural marketing cooperative research: A bibliometric analysis," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(2), pages 291-319, June.
    9. Puttkammer, Judith & Grethe, Harald, . "The Public Debate on Biofuels in Germany: Who Drives the Discourse?," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 64(04).
    10. Delpeuch, Claire & Vandeplas, Anneleen, 2013. "Revisiting the “Cotton Problem”—A Comparative Analysis of Cotton Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 209-221.
    11. Larson,Donald F. & Muraoka,Rie & Otsuka,Keijiro, 2016. "On the central role of small farms in African rural development strategies," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7710, The World Bank.
    12. Saroj & Kirtti Ranjan Paltasingh, 2024. "What promotes production contract in Indian agriculture? Managing market risk versus profit orientation," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(1), pages 140-153, January.
    13. Martins, Franco Müller & Trienekens, Jacques & Omta, Onno, . "Impact of buyers' support on farmer performance and investments in the Brazilian pork supply chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(01).
    14. Yukichi Y. & Mano Yukichi Y. & Takahashi Kazushi & Otsuka Keijiro, 2017. "Contract Farming, Farm Mechanization, and Agricultural Intensification: The Case of Rice Farming in Cote d’Ivoire," Working Papers 157, JICA Research Institute.
    15. Di Marcantonio, F. & Ciaian, P. & Castellanos, V., 2018. "Unfair trading practices in the dairy farm sector: Insights from an EU field survey," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275886, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Awal Abdul‐Rahaman & Awudu Abdulai, 2020. "Vertical coordination mechanisms and farm performance amongst smallholder rice farmers in northern Ghana," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 259-280, April.
    17. Mai Chiem Tuyen & Prapinwadee Sirisupluxana & Isriya Bunyasiri & Pham Xuan Hung, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Preferences towards Contract Attributes: Evidence from Rice Production in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Lin Li & Hongdong Guo, 2019. "The impact of business relationships on safe production behavior by farmers: Evidence from China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 84-96, January.
    19. Thomas Kopp & Ashok K. Mishra, 2022. "Perishability and market power in Nepalese food crop production," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 518-540, June.
    20. Mishra, Ashok K. & Kumar, Anjani & Joshi, Pramod K. & D'Souza, Alwin & Tripathi, Gaurav, 2018. "How can organic rice be a boon to smallholders? Evidence from contract farming in India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-157.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:12:y:2023:i:3:p:295-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.