IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/agspub/v11y2022i2p210-231.html

South–South Cooperation in Agriculture: Impacts of Brazil’s More Food International Program on Post-Land Reform Social Organizations in Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Rangarirai Gavin Muchetu
  • Toendepi Shonhe

Abstract

South–South Cooperation has received significant attention. This article assesses the implications of Brazil’s More Food International on farm-level social organizations in Goromonzi and Mvurwi districts in Zimbabwe. Data was collected using mainly focus group discussions, key-informant interviews, and the application of a questionnaire among 410 farming households. Differentiated implications and outcomes were observed between the two districts. Overall, the Brazilian programs improved access to tractor and irrigation implements. Still, the implements were more suited to the large-scale production systems rather than to those of the small-scale A1 farmers. Furthermore, a top-down approach utilized by the state has adverse consequences. The prerequisite of forming cooperatives before accessing the tractors and irrigation implements disrupted local political and socio-economic organizations already in existence within the two districts. The study concludes that, while farm mechanization is crucial for agricultural production, the exclusion of the farmers during policy conceptualization undermines the success of these programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rangarirai Gavin Muchetu & Toendepi Shonhe, 2022. "South–South Cooperation in Agriculture: Impacts of Brazil’s More Food International Program on Post-Land Reform Social Organizations in Zimbabwe," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 11(2), pages 210-231, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:210-231
    DOI: 10.1177/22779760221103118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22779760221103118
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22779760221103118?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendy Wolford, 2005. "Agrarian Moral Economies and Neoliberalism in Brazil: Competing Worldviews and the State in the Struggle for Land," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 37(2), pages 241-261, February.
    2. Freedom Mazwi & Rangarirai G. Muchetu & George T. Mudimu, 2021. "Revisiting the Trimodal Agrarian Structure as a Social Differentiation Analysis Framework in Zimbabwe: A Study," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 10(2), pages 318-343, August.
    3. Hayami, The late Yujiro & Godo, Yoshihisa, 2005. "Development Economics: From the Poverty to the Wealth of Nations," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 3, number 9780199272716.
    4. Sam Moyo, 2011. "Land concentration and accumulation after redistributive reform in post-settler Zimbabwe," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(128), pages 257-276, June.
    5. Francesco Maria Pierri, 2013. "How Brazil's Agrarian Dynamics Shape Development Cooperation in Africa," IDS Bulletin, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(4), pages 69-79, July.
    6. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2002. "Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(3), pages 460-501, June.
    7. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    8. D. Joseph Stiglitz, 2009. "Moving Beyond Market Fundamentalism To A More Balanced Economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(3), pages 345-360, September.
    9. Kingstone Mujeyi & Jackqueline Mutambara & Shephard Siziba & Wilbert Z. Sadomba & Tarisai K. Manyati, 2015. "Entrepreneurial innovations for agricultural mechanisation in Zimbabwe: Evidence from an informal metal industry survey," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 276-285, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scoones, Ian & Amanor, Kojo & Favareto, Arilson & Qi, Gubo, 2016. "A New Politics of Development Cooperation? Chinese and Brazilian Engagements in African Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Cabral, Lídia & Favareto, Arilson & Mukwereza, Langton & Amanor, Kojo, 2016. "Brazil’s Agricultural Politics in Africa: More Food International and the Disputed Meanings of “Family Farming”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-60.
    3. Anne Musson & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the effect of crisis on cooperatives: a Bayesian performance analysis of French craftsmen cooperatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(25), pages 2657-2678, May.
    4. repec:gig:afjour:v:46:y:2011:i:3:p:83-97 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jael, Paul, 2019. "Does Marginal Productivity Mean Anything in Real Economic Life ?," MPRA Paper 97968, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2020.
    6. Vincent Gramlich & Dennis Jelito & Johannes Sedlmeir, 2024. "Maximal extractable value: Current understanding, categorization, and open research questions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Locatelli, Catherine & Rossiaud, Sylvain, 2011. "A neoinstitutionalist interpretation of the changes in the Russian oil model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 5588-5597, September.
    8. Honma, Masayoshi & Hayami, Yujiro, 2007. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Korea and Taiwan," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48479, World Bank.
    9. Edward John Nyamamu & Credo Simbert Nchimbi & Shakila Halifan Mteti & Gabriel Kanuti Ndimbo, 2025. "Potentials and Challenges for Rural Livelihood Diversification and Poverty Alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, October.
    10. von Davier, Z. & Bahrs, E., . "Leistungsorientierte Lohngestaltung in der Landwirtschaft - Ergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43.
    11. Guoliang Frank Jiang & Roberto Ragozzino, 2025. "International Corporate Development Activities and Information Disclosures in Earnings Calls," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 175-206, April.
    12. Guesmi, Khaled & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2011. "How strong is the global integration of emerging market regions? An empirical assessment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2517-2527.
    13. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Joan Luft & Michael Shields, 2002. "Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 795-803.
    15. Claire A. Hill & Brett H. McDonnell, 2012. "Introduction: The Evolution of the Economic Analysis of Corporate Law," Chapters, in: Claire A. Hill & Brett H. McDonnell (ed.), Research Handbook on the Economics of Corporate Law, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Anna Fielder & Riina Vuorikari & Nuria Rodriguez-Priego & Yves Punie, 2016. "Background Review for Developing the Digital Competence Framework for Consumers: A snapshot of hot-button issues and recent literature," JRC Research Reports JRC103332, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Silvio Vismara, 2018. "Information Cascades among Investors in Equity Crowdfunding," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 467-497, May.
    18. Calixto Salomão Filho, 2015. "Monopolies and Underdevelopment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 16587.
    19. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno Tortia, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    20. le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Kronenburg García, Angela, 2025. "“Dream brokers” and the moral economy of frontier investments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    21. Stefan Schleicher, 2015. "Deepening the Scope of the "Economic Model": Functionalities, Structures, Mechanisms, and Institutions. WWWforEurope Policy Paper No. 24," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58263.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:agspub:v:11:y:2022:i:2:p:210-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.