IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rza/ersawp/vy2025iid149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, selection, compulsory schooling and returns to education along the distribution of wages in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Koch
  • Yoseph Getachew
  • Obrien Muine Samahiya

Abstract

Compulsory schooling laws are designed to keep children in school, under the expectation that doing so increases employment opportunities and wages. However, in South Africa, the education system does not perform as well as it does in other countries, which may, in turn, mitigate the effectiveness of the compulsory schooling reform on labour market outcomes. Gender wage gap research in the country finds significant differences that need further explanation. This research investigates whether the 1997 compulsory schooling law (CSL) partially explains gender differences in the distribution of wages, and whether selection into employment moderates that relationship. The analysis is underpinned by conditional quantile regression, along with a selection-corrected version that incorporates the CSL. The data is taken from the 2018 South African General Household Survey. The results suggest that: returns are higher for women than men, the schooling reform increased returns, and are not constant across either the wage distribution or the level of schooling, suggesting that education increases wage inequality. Furthermore, we find also that correcting for selection into employment reduces the returns for women, but does not alter the ranking of returns along the wage distribution before and after the CSL implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Koch & Yoseph Getachew & Obrien Muine Samahiya, 2025. "Gender, selection, compulsory schooling and returns to education along the distribution of wages in South Africa," ERSA Working Paper Series, Economic Research Southern Africa, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:v::y:2025:i::id:149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/article/view/149/143
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rza:ersawp:v::y:2025:i::id:149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maggi Sigg (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersawps.org/index.php/working-paper-series/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.