IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rss/jnljsh/v3i3p2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Academic Performance: A Case of Psychology Students at the University of Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • O.C. Mwaba Sidney
  • T. Kusanthan
  • J. Anitha Menon

Abstract

Gender disparity in academic performance and general access to educational *opportunities globally and particularly in Zambia has been evident for a long time. This led to the Zambian Government coming up with affirmative action policies to enable more females’ access equal educational opportunities. However, the dynamics of the specific academic performance of each sex, especially at tertiary level has not received much attention in terms of research. Hence it was the aim of this *paper to examine the academic performance through a thorough review of literature. *An example of the academic performance of the psychology degree students at the University of Zambia (UNZA) has been used to discuss the literature. Through the comprehensive analysis of literature, we found four factors emerged that can influence performance, namely: socio- economic factors, course of study, innate differences and Psychological factors. It was also found that over a period of *five years from 2009 to 2013 female psychology students at UNZA consistently obtained a better classification of degrees than the males in psychology. It is possible to speculate that the female students gravitate towards registering for psychology because of their intrinsic liking for the Psychology courses. It is therefore possible to present the argument that the affinity of female students for psychology courses would make them study psychology more than their male counterparts and therefore perhaps achieve better results.

Suggested Citation

  • O.C. Mwaba Sidney & T. Kusanthan & J. Anitha Menon, 2015. "Gender Differences in Academic Performance: A Case of Psychology Students at the University of Zambia," Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(3), pages 131-138.
  • Handle: RePEc:rss:jnljsh:v3i3p2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rassweb.org/admin/pages/ResearchPapers/Paper%202_1496000315.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:cdl:cshedu:qt7306z0zf is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rss:jnljsh:v3i3p2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Danish Khalil (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.rassweb.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.