IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v66y2018i3p155-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Classic Model of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Parameterized and Validated, Similar for Romania and Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Simina – Ioana Brostescu

    (University of Craiova)

Abstract

A brief introduction summarizes the main classic foreign direct investment (FDI) theories, an dis followed by a review of the latest theoretical trends from the literature over the last decade. A brief yet absolutely necessary methodological section is followed by the presentation of an econometric model of classical FDI, specified, parameterized and validated in the case of Romania, and then a similar one for Bulgaria. This is the theme that involves discussions about the almost identical vision that investors have about Romania and Bulgaria, starting from the decision to invest in the economies of these two countries. At the same time, the article attempts a staged presentation of, while redefining, one of the author’s broader projects, described theoretically more extensively, and practically more narrowly, in an article published in this journal (RRS Supplement, 8/2017), which was devoted to a model based on relative international indicators with investor-oriented signalling power (focusing on risk-rating dynamics, corruption and economic freedom indexes). The classic approach of the new type of modelling has factors represented by exclusively value indicators, from loans from commercial banks and other sources, GDP value, gross fixed capital formation (GFCF), imports (M) and exports (X). A few final remarks clarify the prospects of this modeling oriented towards a number of interesting situations generated by the invalidation of other classical models in other ex-socialist economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Simina – Ioana Brostescu, 2018. "A Classic Model of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Parameterized and Validated, Similar for Romania and Bulgaria," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 66(3), pages 155-164, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:155-164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/RRS_03_2018_07en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:66:y:2018:i:3:p:155-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.