IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ7/7964249.html

Composable clearing: how blockchain reconciles efficiency and safety in intermediated markets

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Zhang

Abstract

Clearing sits between trading and settlement and must reconcile two goals that existing designs trade off against one another: efficiency, which requires letting participants trade on privately known preferences, and safety, which requires prefunded collateral and final settlement. We show that neither pooled mechanisms, such as automated market makers, nor purely bilateral ones, such as uncleared over-the-counter markets, can achieve both, whereas a composable two-layer framework – an aggregative trading and price-allocation layer, composed with a prefunded clearing layer through an atomic settlement map – can. Blockchain does not change the economics of clearing; it lowers the cost of implementing this atomic, multilateral composition, expanding the attainable safety–efficiency–prefunding frontier. The framework reinterprets the singleness of money: settling in central bank money is one implementation of the atomic settlement map, but tokenization allows the same finality to be obtained over high-quality collateral such as tokenized Treasury bills, without central bank money necessarily being the settlement asset. Applications to Treasury repo and to thinly traded foreign-exchange pairs show how tokenization is reshaping the structure of financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Zhang, . "Composable clearing: how blockchain reconciles efficiency and safety in intermediated markets," Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures, Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7964249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7964249
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7964249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-financial-market-infrastructures .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.