IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ7/7964245.html

Foreign exchange rationing, digital dollar access and regulatory observability: evidence from Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan M. Fortún Vargas

Abstract

In June 2024 Bolivia repealed a prohibition on using electronic payment instruments for virtual asset operations amid foreign exchange rationing. We combine central bank platform surveillance, supervisory reporting, bank balance sheet records and monthly market data to examine digital dollar access and regulatory observability around the change. Tether purchases observed on a single platform rose from about US$7.5 million per month before the repeal to US$31.7 million in December 2024; supervised intermediaries reported Bs333 million of client virtual-asset operations in December 2024, rising to Bs694 million by June 2025; and client virtual assets in supervised bank custody reached Bs507 million by June 2026. In monthly data, lagged US-dollar-related search attention is unrelated to the parallel market premium before the authorization and negatively associated with it after; the association is stable in sign and magnitude across outcome constructions, while conventional significance weakens in trend- and source-consistent specifications, so we treat the regression as supporting evidence rather than a causal estimate. Argentina and Cambodia are adopted as boundary cases. The evidence suggests that foreign exchange stress and regulatory access jointly shape digital dollar activity, and that authorization can shift activity from ad hoc platform surveillance toward recurrent supervisory reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan M. Fortún Vargas, . "Foreign exchange rationing, digital dollar access and regulatory observability: evidence from Bolivia," Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures, Journal of Financial Market Infrastructures.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7964245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7964245
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ7:7964245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-financial-market-infrastructures .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.