IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7963866.html

The role of dynamic measurement and early warning in China’s stock-market resilience: evidence from 28 industry sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxi Cheng
  • Xiaohuizi Tan
  • Xiangcheng Meng
  • Cheng Li

Abstract

This study quantifies the stock resilience of Chinese industrial sectors across two dimensions: absorption intensity and duration. Drawing on the theoretical framework of Yilin Chen et al, we estimate sectoral responses to shocks (proxied by the Chicago Board Options Exchange’s Volatility Index) using a time-varying parameter vector autoregression model. Our empirical results reveal significant time-variation in resilience, with sharp declines during the 2007–9 global financial crisis, the 2015–16 turmoil in China’s stock markets and the 2020–23 Covid-19 pandemic. We find substantial industry heterogeneity: defensive sectors such as banking are robust, while cyclical sectors such as real estate are vulnerable. Notably, the total correlation index (TCI) reaches 47.19%, indicating strong risk integration. Low-resilience sectors act as central transmitters in the Diebold–Yilmaz spillover network. Finally, a long short-term memory-based model effectively predicts low-resilience states, providing a tool for financial stability monitoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxi Cheng & Xiaohuizi Tan & Xiangcheng Meng & Cheng Li, . "The role of dynamic measurement and early warning in China’s stock-market resilience: evidence from 28 industry sectors," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963866
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.