IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7963411.html

A novel budget-based C+SVM model for credit risk prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Zhe Li
  • Yuxiao Jia
  • Weijiang Ma
  • Zhimin Zhao
  • Xushi Wei

Abstract

Credit risk prediction identifies default risk by establishing a nonlinear relationship between feature data and default status. The feature system is the crucial factor affecting the accuracy of credit risk prediction. This paper addresses how to identify customers within a certain range of cost budgets. A case study on farmers in China shows that the characteristics of incomplete loan information, dispersed residences and strong liquidity indicate that bank lending should consider not only the identification of default customers but also the actual cost budget. A modified support vector machine (C+SVM), which considers the cost of obtaining credit information and the budgets of decision makers, is established to optimize the credit evaluation results. This paper performs feature selection and weighting by optimizing the minimum total misjudgment cost as the objective function while constraining the prediction deviation, feature weights and cost budget. The empirical results for Chinese farmers as customers of a large commercial bank demonstrate that the proposed C+SVM model is effective in selecting credit information costs and that decision makers can achieve the necessary prediction accuracy at lower costs. The best features and weights for credit risk prediction can be obtained for different cost budgets.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhe Li & Yuxiao Jia & Weijiang Ma & Zhimin Zhao & Xushi Wei, . "A novel budget-based C+SVM model for credit risk prediction," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963411
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.