IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7963405.html

Graph neural networks for credit default prediction: robustness and model evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Papalamprou
  • Nikolaos Terzis

Abstract

This study evaluates the robustness and performance of graph-based models for credit default prediction. Two inductive graph neural network (GNN) architectures – GraphSAGE and the graph attention network (GAT) – are implemented within a framework that integrates automated hyperparameter optimization, imbalance-aware loss functions and adversarial stress testing. Borrowers are represented as nodes in a k-nearest neighbor graph constructed from financial and demographic features. Model tuning is performed via Optuna, while robustness is examined under the fast gradient sign method and projected gradient descent perturbations, with adversarial training enhancing stability. Experimental results demonstrate that optimized and adversarially trained GNNs outperform classical baselines such as logistic regression, random forest and gradient boosting in area under the curve and F1 metrics, while maintaining resilience under feature perturbations. These findings highlight the importance of robustness evaluation as part of the broader model assessment process for modern credit risk modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Papalamprou & Nikolaos Terzis, . "Graph neural networks for credit default prediction: robustness and model evaluation," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963405
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.