IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7963255.html

Generative artificial intelligence in model risk management: emerging opportunities, supervisory challenges and validation frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Arun Maheshwari

Abstract

The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has catalyzed a paradigm shift in model development, interpretability and governance across the financial services sector. Large language models and multimodal architectures are increasingly embedded in risk management, compliance and operations, creating both transformative opportunities and unprecedented supervisory challenges. This paper examines the intersection of GenAI and model risk management in relation to emerging regulatory expectations, model validation frameworks and practical applications. Drawing on recent supervisory developments and empirical experience in model risk governance, it proposes a structured approach to validating GenAI systems in line with the principles of US Federal Reserve Supervisory Letter SR 11-7, Prudential Regulation Authority Supervisory statement Supervisory Statement SS 1/23 and Basel Committee on Banking Supervision AI risk management guidance. The paper also presents a real-world case study on validating an alert-reduction model for sanctions screening, based on a large language model, which illustrates how conceptual soundness, performance testing and interpretability can be achieved in an environment where regulatory expectations, explainability and innovation intersect.

Suggested Citation

  • Arun Maheshwari, . "Generative artificial intelligence in model risk management: emerging opportunities, supervisory challenges and validation frameworks," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963255
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7963255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.