Author
Abstract
Accurately predicting default risk among small businesses is critical for lenders and policy makers. However, traditional credit risk models often rely on extensive financial statements that many small enterprises lack. This study explores the value of integrating the personal credit bureau data of business owners, along with business-level and tradeline variables, within a machine learning framework to improve default prediction. Using a large data set from the Gies Consumer and Small Business Credit Panel, our baseline models relying solely on fundamental business attributes achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of approximately 0.78. Incorporating business tradeline information (such as active accounts and delinquency patterns) raises performance only slightly (AUROC ≈ 0:79). In contrast, adding personal credit features substantially boosts accuracy, pushing the best-performing gradient boosting models (XGBoost, Light- GBM and CatBoost) above 0.83. Feature importance analyses underscore the intertwined nature of business and owner finances: variables capturing personal credit scores, outstanding balances and recent inquiries rank among the strongest predictors, alongside measures of business debt (eg, Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) filings and open tradeline balances). These findings reveal that personal credit factors can fill critical information gaps when formal business records are scant, thereby strengthening credit risk assessments and enhancing lending decisions in the small business sector. In addition, our results highlight the critical importance of validating risk models using alternative data sources, ensuring greater robustness and reliability in predicting small business defaults.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7962833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.