IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/7962046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive explainable approach for imbalanced financial distress prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Ruhao Chen
  • Tong-Yu Lu
  • Jiyuan Min
  • Wenfu Xu

Abstract

Financial distress prediction (FDP) models are important risk prevention and control tools for monitoring the financial status of companies. To simultaneously address the issue of imbalanced data and the explanation of “black box†models in FDP, we propose an explainable approach for imbalanced FDP through focal-aware extreme gradient boosting (FL-XGBoost). In this approach we address the difficulty of identifying minority-class samples in imbalanced data sets by introducing the focal loss function into the XGBoost framework. Validation tests of different FDP models show the strong performance of our proposed model. Moreover, we use three explanatory methods to generate explanations for different FDP model users. The experimental results based on different kinds of imbalanced data sets show that our proposed method, FL-XGBoost, has strong classification performance. Further, the explanatory methods can increase the transparency and credibility of our proposed black box model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruhao Chen & Tong-Yu Lu & Jiyuan Min & Wenfu Xu, . "A comprehensive explainable approach for imbalanced financial distress prediction," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7962046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962046
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:7962046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.