IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2186770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further recipes for quantitative reverse stress testing

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Grundke

Abstract

ABSTRACT As a consequence of the 2007-9 financial crisis, the regulatory authorities now oblige banks to carry out reverse stress tests. This new instrument in the stress test toolbox aims to find those scenarios that cause a bank to cross the frontier between survival and default. Afterward, the scenario that is most likely to occur has to be identified. In a 2011 paper by Grundke it is argued that bottom-up approaches, which are a specific integrated risk measurement technique, are basically well suited to solving the inversion problem inherent in a reverse stress test and, in particular, for computing the probabilities of reverse stress test scenarios while taking existing risk dependencies into account. Building upon the earlier work of Grundke, this paper shows how the modeling framework previously presented can be extended to incorporate more real-world features such as a time-varying credit quality of the bank or contagion effects. The consequences on the results of the reverse stress test are analyzed for each modification.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Grundke, . "Further recipes for quantitative reverse stress testing," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2186770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation/2186770/further-recipes-for-quantitative-reverse-stress-testing
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2186770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.