IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ5/2161265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The accuracy of credit scoring receiver operating characteristic in the presence of macroeconomic shocks

Author

Listed:
  • George A. Christodoulakis
  • Stephen E. Satchell

Abstract

ABSTRACT The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is often used by creditors to assess credit scoring accuracy and as part of their Basel II model validation. The purpose of this paper is to provide a mathematical procedure to assess the accuracy of ROC curve estimates for credit defaults in the presence of macroeconomic shocks. Our approach supplements the nonparametric method recommended by Engelmann et al (2003) based on the Mann–Whitney test, which is used as a summary statistic of ROC curves. Our method assumes initially that both sick and healthy loan credit rating scores are generated by normal distributions, and shows how ROC estimate depend on the location and scale parameters. We then use these results to construct ROC confidence intervals in closed form and examine the influence of exogenous macroeconomic shocks. We further generalize our method by allowing credit rating scores to be generated by skewnormal distributions, thus allowing skewness to affect the moments of the distribution. We show how the presence of skewness would result in further inaccuracy in model validation.

Suggested Citation

  • George A. Christodoulakis & Stephen E. Satchell, . "The accuracy of credit scoring receiver operating characteristic in the presence of macroeconomic shocks," Journal of Risk Model Validation, Journal of Risk Model Validation.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation/2161265/the-accuracy-of-credit-scoring-receiver-operating-characteristic-in-the-presence-of-macroeconomic-shocks
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ5:2161265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk-model-validation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.