IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7963509.html

Forecasting Chinese crude oil futures’ volatility: a heterogeneous volatility spillover-conditional autoregressive range model

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Wu
  • Rongrong Tu
  • Xiaona Wang

Abstract

This paper proposes the heterogeneous volatility spillover-conditional autoregressive range (HVS-CARR) model for modeling and forecasting Chinese crude oil futures’ volatility, which is a common measure of Chinese crude oil market risk. The proposed HVS-CARR model is able to account for extreme-value information as well as the time-varying volatility spillovers from international to Chinese crude oil futures markets, thereby enhancing the assessment of Chinese crude oil market risk. Our empirical results show the presence of time-varying volatility spillovers from the West Texas Intermediate futures market to the Shanghai International Energy Exchange crude oil futures market, and they indicate that the spillover spiked during the 2020–23 Covid-19 pandemic, reflecting a period of aggravated Chinese crude oil market risk. In particular, we observe that the proposed HVS-CARR model outperforms a variety of competing models in terms of out-of-sample volatility forecasting, including the return-based generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model, the GARCH-mixed-data sampling (GARCH-MIDAS) model and the HVS-GARCH model, as well as the range-based CARR model and the CARRMIDAS model, highlighting the improved ability of our proposed HVS-CARR model to quantify and forecast Chinese crude oil market risk. Finally, we confirm that incorporating extreme-value information and time-varying volatility spillover effects into a volatility-timing strategy leads to substantial economic gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Wu & Rongrong Tu & Xiaona Wang, . "Forecasting Chinese crude oil futures’ volatility: a heterogeneous volatility spillover-conditional autoregressive range model," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7963509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963509
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7963509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.