IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7963110.html

From expansion to recession: unraveling the performance of Chinese hedge funds through economic shifts

Author

Listed:
  • Xiangrui Zeng
  • Rui Guo
  • Zhigang Qiu
  • Hefei Wang

Abstract

In this paper, we use a Markov regime-switching model to analyze hedge fund performance in China, distinguishing between economic expansion and recession phases, and we employ a stepwise regression method to identify the key factors influencing hedge fund strategies within each economic regime. This model adeptly captures the nonlinear characteristics of hedge fund returns, allowing for a precise assessment of performance fluctuations tied to different economic states. Our findings reveal that during economic expansions most hedge funds struggle to generate significant positive alpha and rely primarily on momentum strategies. However, during recessions, hedge funds strategically reduce their risk exposure, with neutral, event-driven, arbitrage and bond strategies, for example, showing the ability to generate positive alpha returns. This shift in risk exposure and asset allocation underscores the adaptive strategies used by hedge funds to mitigate risks and capitalize on opportunities during downturns. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of hedge fund performance in China, a rapidly evolving financial market that presents unique challenges and opportunities distinct from more developed Western markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiangrui Zeng & Rui Guo & Zhigang Qiu & Hefei Wang, . "From expansion to recession: unraveling the performance of Chinese hedge funds through economic shifts," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7963110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963110
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7963110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.