IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7962327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A robust distorted Orlicz premium: modeling, computational scheme and applications

Author

Listed:
  • Qiong Wu
  • Huifu Xu

Abstract

In 2018, Bellini and coauthors proposed a robust version of the Orlicz premium for when there is an ambiguity in the subjective probability distribution of the underlying uncertainty or a multiplicity of Young functions. Inspired by their work, we take a step further and consider the case where the probability distribution is distorted. Distortion is widely used in behavioral economics and actuarial science and reflects the fact that decision makers often underweight medium and high probabilities of extreme outcomes but overweight low probabilities of such outcomes. We introduce the novel notion of a distorted Orlicz premium (DOP) and a robust distorted Orlicz premium (RDOP) when the information on distortion is incomplete. We demonstrate how Knightian ambiguity and distortion ambiguity can be synthesized in a single robust model and investigate the properties of DOP and RDOP. Moreover, we discuss how an ambiguity set of distortion functions may be constructed, and we propose tractable computational schemes for computing the DOP and RDOP. In the case when the Young function is piecewise linear, we demonstrate that calculating RDOP comes down to solving a linear program. The distortion and robust arguments are extended to the Haezendonck–Goovaerts risk measure with an application in portfolio optimization. Some numerical test results are reported.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiong Wu & Huifu Xu, . "A robust distorted Orlicz premium: modeling, computational scheme and applications," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7962327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962327
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7962327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.