IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7962173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The connectedness, structure and performance of different financial networks

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Wuyi
  • Wang Xuhui
  • Li Mingge
  • Guo Ranran

Abstract

We conduct a comparative analysis of quantitative models for assessing risk contagion and systemic risk within the Chinese financial market, focusing on four key methodologies: vector autoregression-forecast error variance decomposition (VAR-FEVD), quantile vector autoregression-forecast error variance decomposition QVAR-FEVD, linear conditional value-at-risk (CoVaR) and tail-event driven network (TENET). Our analysis underscores the significance of network construction methods in accurately depicting the spillover effects among financial institutions. The research delves into the performance of financial networks by comparing “physical†networks, evaluating predefined networks within the dynamic network quantile regression model, and identifying systemically important financial institutions across various network configurations. In particular, the TENET model emerges as particularly adept, outperforming the other models in capturing both mean and tail risk spillovers. This paper not only deepens the understanding of systemic risk in China but also provides valuable recommendations for policy makers to design effective regulatory frameworks to mitigate potential crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Wuyi & Wang Xuhui & Li Mingge & Guo Ranran, . "The connectedness, structure and performance of different financial networks," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7962173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962173
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7962173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.