IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ4/7961866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A dynamic method-of-moments copula model approach for market risk estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Aussenegg
  • Christian Cech

Abstract

This study presents a method-of-moments copula approach in a dynamic setting for estimating the market risk of asset portfolios. On using exponential generalized conditional heteroscedasticity (EGARCH) volatility-adjusted returns to account for heteroscedasticity, our findings reveal that the method-of-moments approach significantly reduces the copula estimation time for 99% value-at-risk estimates without loss of accuracy while outperforming several benchmark models. This creates an advantage for practical applications, especially for portfolios with higher dimensions. We also use this model to calculate 97.5% expected shortfall estimates. Our empirical results are based on a mixed 21-dimensional portfolio consisting of five classes of financial assets often included in trading books of financial institutions (stocks, stock indexes, bonds, foreign exchange and commodities). An investigation period of nearly 35 years (January 1990 to November 2024) ensures the inclusion of several severe crisis periods with strong sudden price movements and corresponding shocks to the dependence structure. More than 8200 trading days and a rolling 250-day estimation window for dynamic out-of-sample risk estimates generate an interesting base for accuracy tests. Overall, the best accuracy is generated by a meta-Student t model using EGARCH volatility-adjusted returns with method-of-moments copula estimation. An additional simulation study shows that the computational advantage of our dynamic method-of-moments copula approach persists for portfolios of higher dimensions with up to 400 risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Aussenegg & Christian Cech, . "A dynamic method-of-moments copula model approach for market risk estimates," Journal of Risk, Journal of Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7961866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961866
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ4:7961866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.