IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7963814.html

Operational risk measurement: integrating the amplification effects of reputational risk

Author

Listed:
  • Yinghui Wang
  • Xuting Mao
  • Jianping Li
  • Xiaoqian Zhu
  • Yizhe Dong

Abstract

Operational risk events lead not only to direct economic losses but also to negative stakeholder evaluations, escalating into reputational risk. Due primarily to quantification challenges, existing research often underestimates operational risk capital by overlooking the amplification effect of reputational risk. This paper proposes an approach to measuring operational risk losses that integrates the interplay between reputational and operational risks. Based on 3723 data observations from the Chinese Operational Loss Database, this paper quantifies the reputational losses triggered by operational risk events, demonstrating their amplification effects on direct losses. For example, the operational risk capital is estimated at ¥322.278 billion based on the traditional loss distribution approach, while this figure jumps ¥1687.706 billion when the amplification effects of reputational risk are incorporated. This study explores the complex interplay between operational risk and reputational risk, providing a new perspective for the more rational allocation of operational risk capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinghui Wang & Xuting Mao & Jianping Li & Xiaoqian Zhu & Yizhe Dong, . "Operational risk measurement: integrating the amplification effects of reputational risk," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963814
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.