IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7963674.html

Managing the risks of generative AI: a framework for enterprise risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Haidar
  • Christine Balagué

Abstract

As organizations increasingly integrate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into core business functions, a new landscape of managerial and operational risk is emerging that remains insufficiently explored in academic research. By developing a conceptual framework for mitigating these risks, based on a semi-systematic literature review of 76 peer-reviewed articles from Web of Science, this study aims to identify how GenAI is reshaping enterprise risk management. We apply keyword co-occurrence analysis, a quantitative clustering technique conducted using VOSVIEWER, to identify five key constructs that underpin risk emergence in managerial contexts: the enterprise readiness gap; novice risk work; shadow GenAI governance; unethical GenAI; and innovation drift. These constructs are systematically mapped to 10 typologies of GenAI-related risks (eg, data-related, legal, human-GenAI interaction) and further refined into 36 distinct observed risks (eg, loss of control, hallucinations, customer well-being concerns), highlighting how these risks materialize in practice. The framework outlines a system of relationships that explains how these risks manifest across six core management functions: strategy; human resources; operations; finance; marketing; and legal compliance. The review highlights that GenAI risks are both strategic and operational, presenting five propositions that map GenAI risk patterns to guide enterprise risk managers in scenario-based risk modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Haidar & Christine Balagué, . "Managing the risks of generative AI: a framework for enterprise risk management," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963674
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.