IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7963600.html

The key role of accounting intelligence and risk management in the practical economy: a new insight into company profitability

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Chen
  • Yuechao Zhu
  • Huihua Zheng
  • Shanqiu Liu

Abstract

In the face of rapid technological advancements and the ever-changing international situation, enterprise risk management (ERM) is becoming increasingly important and valuable. However, there is currently a lack of clear understanding of risk management and the connections between risk factors, and most of the data comes from European and North American countries, meaning there is a lack of empirical analysis of the differentiation mechanism for emerging market economies. In response to these issues, this study uses partial least squares structural equation modeling and response surface methodology to explore the example of a Malaysian financial industry. The results show that ERM significantly improves both financial performance (p < 0:01) and nonfinancial performance (p < 0:05), while the technology investment compensation system is weak. These results indicate that the moderating effect of accounting intelligence enhances the effectiveness of ERM. By embedding ERM into a dynamic capability framework, this study provides a new perspective on the complex relationship between ERM and enterprise performance, and should serve as a reference for understanding enterprise practices in emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Chen & Yuechao Zhu & Huihua Zheng & Shanqiu Liu, . "The key role of accounting intelligence and risk management in the practical economy: a new insight into company profitability," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963600
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.