IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7963502.html

Determinants of enterprise risk management implementation: evidence from multinational corporations across the three lines of defense

Author

Listed:
  • Roopa MN
  • Priti Bakhshi

Abstract

Enterprise risk management (ERM) is frequently regarded as an effective tool to handle interrelated risks in an environment of increased risk complexity. This empirical study on ERM examines various ERM factors from many fields, in particular those that influence ERM implementation. A systematic literature review of 151 articles from international peer reviewed journals was carried out. In a pilot study and subsequent analysis, ADANCO 2.2.1 was used as a statistical tool to examine 309 survey responses across three lines of defense in multinational corporations. The findings deepen understanding of the influencing factors in the acceptance of ERM among ERM implementers, senior executives and boards of directors, which is useful to organizations that have begun ERM deployment. The study catalogues these key factors and proposes a conceptual model for its implementation, making a strong case for ERM adoption by firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Roopa MN & Priti Bakhshi, . "Determinants of enterprise risk management implementation: evidence from multinational corporations across the three lines of defense," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963502
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7963502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.