IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7962476.html

How has the anti-corruption campaign affected operational efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinrui Zhan
  • Jingbin He

Abstract

Leveraging China’s anti-corruption campaign as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper uses a panel data set comprising all Chinese listed firms over the period from 2008 to 2018.We employ dynamic difference-in-differences estimation to investigate the causal effect of the Chinese government’s anti-corruption campaign on firm operational efficiency. Our empirical evidence supports the notion that the anti-corruption campaign can enhance firm operational efficiency significantly (by approximately 7%). Drawing upon the theoretical framework of the attention-based view, we further examine the moderating effects of political connections, regional market development and corporate social responsibility performance. Our empirical results align with the attention-based view and indicate that these moderating factors collectively undermine firms’ operational efficiency by diverting management attention. Our study contributes to the literature by investigating the impact of an improved institutional environment on firm operational performance and by expanding the scope of the attention-based view. In addition, we provide essential insights for policy makers, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive anti-corruption measures, and we offer decision makers valuable insights into prioritizing operational activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinrui Zhan & Jingbin He, . "How has the anti-corruption campaign affected operational efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962476
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.