IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7962135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

National geopolitical risk perception and corporate innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Zhang
  • Sinmyong Sok

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of national geopolitical risk perception on corporate innovation behavior and its underlying mechanisms. We construct a national-level geopolitical risk perception index based on Chinese online newspaper data and use a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2000 to 2022 to conduct an empirical study from the perspectives of innovation quantity, efficiency and quality. Our study finds that geopolitical risk perception significantly promotes the improvement of innovation quantity and efficiency but leads to a decline in innovation quality. Mechanism analysis indicates that geopolitical risk perception affects corporate innovation by intensifying market competition and reducing corporate profitability. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that firms with different levels of marketization, more political connections and different industry types exhibit significant differences in their innovation responses to geopolitical risk. This study provides a new perspective for understanding the relationship between geopolitical risk and corporate innovation and also offers a basis for relevant policy formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Zhang & Sinmyong Sok, . "National geopolitical risk perception and corporate innovation," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962135
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.