IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7962015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived workplace accident frequency and its impact on employee withholding behaviors and perceived productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Toufik Serradj
  • Amal Saidani

Abstract

This study investigates the relationships between the perceived frequency of workplace accidents, employee withholding behaviors and perceived productivity and examines the moderating effects of perceived risk and proactive communication of safety measures. Based on a sample of 453 employees, from large- and medium-sized enterprises across various high-risk industries, the research tests five hypotheses: the negative impact of the perceived frequency of workplace accidents on perceived productivity; the negative correlation between employee withholding and perceived productivity; the mediating role of employee withholding in the link between perceived accident frequency and perceived productivity; the moderating role of perceived risk in this relationship; and the attenuating effect of proactive safety communication. The results support the first four hypotheses and partially support the fifth, showing that a higher perceived frequency of workplace accidents is associated with increased withholding behaviors, which in turn are negatively related to perceived productivity. Moreover, employees’ perceived risk and proactive communication of safety measures significantly moderate these effects. These findings underline the importance of addressing subjective risk assessments and safety communication strategies as part of an integrated workplace safety and performance management approach. Future research should consider longitudinal designs to further investigate the causal mechanisms underlying these relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Toufik Serradj & Amal Saidani, . "Perceived workplace accident frequency and its impact on employee withholding behaviors and perceived productivity," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.