IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7962012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping the influence of enterprise risk management: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhangwei Zheng
  • Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M
  • Hafizah Omar Zaki
  • Qin Lingda Tan

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of enterprise risk management (ERM) through bibliometric analysis and a systematic review using the theory–context–method (TCM) framework. Analyzing 135 Scopus-indexed documents including 27 high-quality journal articles, the research highlights global trends, thematic clusters and emerging topics in ERM. Performance analysis reveals a sustained interest in ERM, with significant geographic and institutional disparities. Six thematic clusters reveal critical research areas, while emerging topics include ERM’s integration with digital transformation and sector-specific applications. The TCM analysis highlights the dominance of ERM theory and quantitative regression methods, particularly in the United States. The systematic review confirms that ERM generally enhances firm performance, particularly in mature stages of implementation, though mixed results in some contexts highlight the need for further exploration of mediating factors. By integrating bibliometric and systematic review methodologies, this study provides a comprehensive overview of ERM research, offering valuable insights to guide future theoretical, methodological and practical advances.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhangwei Zheng & Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M & Hafizah Omar Zaki & Qin Lingda Tan, . "Mapping the influence of enterprise risk management: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962012
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7962012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.