IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7961828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do bank complexities increase the risks? Insights from four Asian countries

Author

Listed:
  • Rayenda Khresna Brahmana
  • Muhammad Arsalan Hashmi
  • Dr Abdullah
  • Nuzhat Jabin Syed

Abstract

The Basel III accord recommends diversification of the banking industry to better achieve financial stability. However, diversification creates bank complexity, which increases bank risk. This research examines the effect of bank complexity on bank risk within Asian banking systems, specifically those of China, Malaysia, Pakistan and Qatar. The study finds that the impact of bank complexity varies across countries and risk measurements. For instance, organizational complexity affects bank risk in China, Malaysia and Pakistan but not in Qatar. Meanwhile, business complexity reduces the risk of financial distress in Qatar and idiosyncratic risk in Malaysia. Geographical complexity increases financial risk in China but not in Malaysia and Qatar, while it increases market risk in Pakistan. The findings contribute to the literature by suggesting that bank complexity is not always beneficial or disadvantageous for banks in a risk context, and they cause us to reconsider some aspects of diversification studies. Moreover, the study provides policy implications, emphasizing the importance of regulatory oversight in managing bank complexity and mitigating regulatory arbitrage.

Suggested Citation

  • Rayenda Khresna Brahmana & Muhammad Arsalan Hashmi & Dr Abdullah & Nuzhat Jabin Syed, . "Do bank complexities increase the risks? Insights from four Asian countries," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961828
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.