IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7961814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of banks’ digital transformation in operational risk management: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wanrui Dai
  • Liangrong Song

Abstract

Against the dual backdrop of digital economy development and financial risk prevention and control, this paper investigates the impact of banks’ digital transformation on operational risk using panel data for Chinese listed commercial banks from 2013 to 2021. It shows that bank digital transformation and its subareas, except for management digitalization, significantly lower operational risk. This effect is stronger for regional banks and those facing less capital regulation pressure. Further, the operational risk reduction from banks’ digital transformation is mainly driven by traditional and financial businesses rather than nontraditional ones. More importantly, digitalization-induced bank operational risk mitigation enhances the market value. These findings will provide practitioners and regulators with new insights into the role of banks’ digital transformation in operational risk governance and offer useful references for other countries to decrease bank risk losses and alleviate capital pressure by digital means.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanrui Dai & Liangrong Song, . "The role of banks’ digital transformation in operational risk management: evidence from China," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961814
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.