IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ3/7961810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk measures associated with insurance losses in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Kwofie
  • Williams Kumi
  • Henry Otoo
  • Sampson Takyi Appiah
  • Eric Ocran

Abstract

Value-at-risk (VaR) and tail value-at-risk (TVaR) have been used extensively in the financial sector to estimate the worst possible losses for a given portfolio. However, not much has been done to apply these concepts in insurance. It is particularly useful to know, on average, the largest possible claim an insurance company can pay in order to readjust its annual premium rate for compensating possible losses. To this end, this study estimates the VaR and TVaR of comprehensive motor insurance losses (claims) paid by an insurance company in Ghana. In order to identify which continuous distribution function best fits our data, we fit our data to a number of different continuous distributions and then test their goodness-of-fit using the Kolmogorov– Smirnov test. The lognormal distribution is the best fit to our data. VaR and TVaR are then estimated using the lognormal distribution function. Analysis of variance is used to check if there are statistically significant differences between the estimates obtained from both risk measures. Given the vast difference in the estimates provided by both risk measures, it is essential for actuaries to critically assess the type of risk measure used when advocating for reinsurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Kwofie & Williams Kumi & Henry Otoo & Sampson Takyi Appiah & Eric Ocran, . "Risk measures associated with insurance losses in Ghana," Journal of Operational Risk, Journal of Operational Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961810
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ3:7961810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.