IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ2/7963822.html

Predicting Chinese carbon prices and influence factors: evidence from quantile shrinkage methods

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Wang
  • Ruofei Wang

Abstract

This paper aims to forecast Chinese carbon prices by utilizing a variety of predictors and analyzing their impact across various carbon market conditions and emergency (“black swan†) events. Advanced models, including shrinkage methods, quantile shrinkage methods, dimension reduction methods, autoregressive models, combination forecasting versions of autoregressive models with exogenous indicators and machine learning tools, are employed. To assess their predictive capabilities, we incorporate five groups of macroeconomic variables alongside 18 technical indicators. The findings reveal that using a rolling window forecasting approach, the quantile group least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) model exhibits superior prediction accuracy compared with other models. The robustness of the results is further validated through an alternative carbon market, a recursive window rule with varying window lengths and an economic value analysis. In addition, this study explores how the effects of statistically significant factors vary across quantiles and emergency events. This study provides market participants and policy makers with an effective tool for Chinese carbon price forecasting, helping them identify key predictors and make informed investment decisions under various market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Wang & Ruofei Wang, . "Predicting Chinese carbon prices and influence factors: evidence from quantile shrinkage methods," Journal of Energy Markets, Journal of Energy Markets.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7963822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7963822
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ2:7963822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-energy-markets .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.