IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ1/7962059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public interest assessment in resolution of small and medium-sized banks in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Andrej R StopczyÅ„ski

Abstract

The assessment of the public interest rationale in bank resolution remains a contentious issue within the regulatory framework of the European Union (EU). The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) was introduced to provide a structured approach to handling failing banks while minimizing systemic risk and protecting taxpayers. However, inconsistencies in the application of public interest assessments (PIAs) have led to divergent resolution practices across member states. This study analyzes 39 cases of banks classified as failing or likely to fail between 2015 and 2022, examining the key determinants influencing PIA decisions. Of these, the Single Resolution Board assessed public interest in 8 cases, while national resolution authorities handled 31 cases. This study empirically analyzes the key determinants of PIAs in EU bank resolution, focusing on systemic risk, bank size and bank localness. Using Firth’s logistic regression, the analysis reveals that local banks are disproportionately subject to resolution, suggesting that national authorities may prioritize regional economic stability over strict systemic risk considerations. The findings highlight a regulatory bias that challenges the consistency and predictability of resolution decisions. This study contributes to the ongoing debate on banking resolution by identifying key determinants of PIA and proposing policy recommendations to enhance the transparency and uniformity of resolution practices across the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrej R StopczyÅ„ski, . "Public interest assessment in resolution of small and medium-sized banks in the European Union," Journal of Credit Risk, Journal of Credit Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7962059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7962059
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7962059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.