IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ1/7961563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did fintech loans default more during the Covid-19 pandemic? Were fintech firms “cream-skimming†the best borrowers?

Author

Listed:
  • Julapa Jagtiani
  • Catharine Lemieux
  • Brandon Goldstein

Abstract

A growing portion of consumer credit has been devoted to unsecured personal installment loans. Fintech firms have been active players in this market, with an increasing market share, while the market share of banks has declined. This paper uses recent loan data, including that from the Covid-19 pandemic period, and finds that a proprietary loan rating system that leverages alternative data and artificial intelligence and/or machine learning could both disaggregate the risk beyond those predicted by a traditional credit risk model and identify the “invisible prime†consumers from the nonprime pool. This loan rating system continued to perform well during the pandemic despite the unexpected adverse economic shock that affected consumers unevenly. It contained different information than the traditional measure of credit risk, and the inclusion of both measures in the regression analysis improved the fit of the model. We also show that default rates for nonprime consumers are much lower on LendingClub installment loans than on traditional consumer loans during the pandemic period. In exploring the potential cream-skimming, we find that there is an additional factor that is correlated with default but uncorrelated with credit scores, alternative ratings or economic factors. This unique factor, which is not captured by the typical credit risk model but is important in determining a loan’s default probability, is likely responsible for some believing in the occurrence of cream-skimming behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Julapa Jagtiani & Catharine Lemieux & Brandon Goldstein, . "Did fintech loans default more during the Covid-19 pandemic? Were fintech firms “cream-skimming†the best borrowers?," Journal of Credit Risk, Journal of Credit Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7961563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961563
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ1:7961563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-credit-risk .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.